Manny’s Take:
The opening game of the tri-nations saw traditional rivals New Zealand and Australia locking horns in Auckland. But while so much has changed in rugby; yet, so much has stayed the same. The ground was soft underfoot, with the weather occasionally wet. NZ dominated the tight play, with Australia, particularly Baxter, being penalized repeatedly at scrum time; Australia dominated the line-outs and managed to steal a number of throws from the All Blacks; New Zealand offered a more direct and physical approach to the game; Australia opted to spread the ball out wide when they could and often had a number of dummy runners to confuse the opposition’s defensive line, a creative and expansive approach that helped the Wallabies to get over the gain line on a number of occassions; in general both teams defended well, particularly Australia, who looked well organized the whole game through. In the end a missed opportunity here and a silly mistake there separated the two teams and the home side turned out as the victors on the day. Like I said, it seems like we have read this script before; both teams’ strengths and weaknesses are the same as they have been for a decade now.
As expected, the more confident Australian team hit the ground running, and we’re unlucky not to find themselves up 17-3 within the first twenty minutes of the game. Had Barnes opted to switch the ball inside to an eager Stirling Mortlock, or had he given a softer pass to George Smith once Mils had committed to the tackle, then the Wallabies would have had a fourteen point gap on the All Blacks, and more importantly would have in all probability shattered the fragile confidence of the All Blacks. That moment turned out to be a critical turning point in the game. New Zealand took heart from their lucky break, awoke from their slumber, and clawed their way back into the game by playing smarter, tighter, more direct rugby. Australia are still not physical enough when it comes to contesting for the ball. Too much reliance is placed on the amazing ability of George Smith to steal the ball without the other forwards pitching in to either protect the ball or to force opposition turnovers. The All Blacks completely dominated this facet of the game and the Wallabies need to rectify this problem if they want to have any chance of beating a very physical Bok side in their next game.
Baxter was unlucky in my mind during the set pieces. Craig Joubert seems to have been making decisions based on reputation rather than what was in front of him. I am no expert when it comes to the front row, but I remember on two of the three occasions that Baxter was penalized, that Tony Woodcock had failed to bind onto his opposite man, and this had led the scrum to go down. How this results in an All Black penalty I will need Mr Joubert to explain. What was unfortunate for one of these penalties is that it was in an attacking position for the Wallabies, and the backline would no doubt have been licking their lips at an opportunity to create gaps in the New Zealand defensive line and hopefully get points on the board.
New Zealand were atrocious in the line outs however, and this will be a major concern when they face Matfield and the rest of the Boks on Saturday. With the Boks having a pretty solid scrum as well this could mean that the All Blacks face the prospect of playing against SA without any first phase ball, which would be disastrous to say the least. In general, the All Blacks quite frankly did not look too impressive. Donald, after a wobbly start, had a decent game. But I still feel the All Blacks are handicapped in the number 10 position. The physical nature of the All Blacks play and the mistakes made by the Wallabies seem to have contributed more to the NZ win than anything else. Burgess in particular made some really bad decisions at critical moments and needs to look at himself long and hard if he wants to make that Wallaby number 9 jersey his own.
But enough of the negative stuff. Australia can take heart from the fact that besides the questionable decisions made by Joubert, the scrum looked okay. The lineout was also very impressive and set a good foundation from which Australia could launch their attacks. Will Genia looked good when he came on to replace Burgess and the Wallaby backline managed to repeatedly get over the NZ gain line and also managed to contain the threat of Nonu, Mils and Sivivatu. Young O Connor got a feel of the Bledisloe Cup. He didn’t play too well but now that the first game is under his belt expect him to get better and better. Australia also know that they lost the game more than New Zealand winning it. Costly errors led to the defeat, and once these are rectified the team looks good enough to beat anyone.
For New Zealand, their tight play ability to contest for the ball on the ground was impressive and will prove a huge bonus to the team. McCaw lasted the full 80 minutes and looked competitive. Donald got over his nerves and eventually passed what has been his biggest test so far. If he gets confident and gets more game time he can only get better; and despite an “average team performance, NZ still came out on top, which will really help boost the teams own self –belief.
Man of the Match: This is a tough one, but for leading his pack admirably and helping to dominate the Wallabies on the ground, and for scoring his teams solitary try, Richie McCaw.
Ron’s Take:
Going into the game I was very worried about the All Blacks prospects up against a Wallaby team that looks great on paper. From the start of the match, the Wallabies were on the front foot and it was no surprise that they took the early lead through Barnes. It was always going to be up hill for the All Blacks from there but credit to them, they dug deep and never gave up. As Manny has pointed out above, the Wallabies lost the game as opposed to New Zealand winning it. If Barnes had offloaded to Mortlock and Australia had scored, it would have been a totally different story as I could not see the All Blacks coming back into the game.
The All Black lineout was shocking! They need to seriously work hard on it this week before they take on the Boks. Scrum time was also shaky for the All Blacks and I failed to understand why Baxter was being blown for penalties all the time at the scrums. I have a feeling that if a ref decides that he is against you, he is going to blow you for the rest of the match. Which is really unfair. There needs to be more clarity about the scrum.
There is no doubting the importance of Richie McCaw in the All Black team. He is an immense player and the key to this All Black team. I remember hearing the commentary during the game and they questioned if Richie and Rodney would be able to last the full 80 minutes due to their injuries and lack of game time and then one commentator responded, “They have big hearts!” And those big hearts pulled through at the end of the day.
I was largely disappointed with Muliaina at the back for the All Blacks. I have seen him play much better games and he needs to make up for it come Saturday. I was not happy seeing Cory Jane in the starting lineup but he held his own but I still hope that we see Joey back in the starting lineup on Saturday. Manny has gone with Richie as his man of the match and I can not complain with that but for me it was Sivivatu. I have not seen a winger look for work as much as Sivi did on Saturday. On many occasions you would see him as the first receiver and his judgement and decision making from there was just as good as a seasoned flyhalfs. As for the worst player on the night, I have to give that to young James O’Connor. I am a huge fan of this guy but he really let me down on Saturday when he came off the bench. I will not forget his pass into touch!! But as Manny said, hopefully now with the experience under his belt he will learn from it. And knowing Robbie Deans, he will not drop O’Connor and he will keep fielding him.
In all fairness, the All Blacks are not looking good. They really need to step up big time come this weekend against the Boks but if there is any team that can beat the Boks in South Africa, it is the All Blacks.
8 comments
Fraz says:
Jul 20, 2009
Lads for me as a bok fan it was a pleasure to watch this game!!
I have never seen an all back side look so exposed on defense!! it was shocking and credit to the aussies first phases as they broke the line at will!! Make sure some hard running from some strong boks such as jaques fourie will test this again this weekend!!
Very Average from the all blacks and make sure too that victor will have a field day in the lineouts….
But as much as the aussies did impress they were finishing like the lions…..do all the hard work create gaps and tries are imminent then throw it away in a blaze of glory!
Now you can say all the what ifs you like about if everything went perfect, but then you can do that for any team on any night and make a csae for that team to win…..bottom line, if you can’t put points on the board you will lose.
Guru says:
Jul 20, 2009
I was personally impressed by the fact that NZ had a very average game with an average team and yet they won vs a side with more than average side,oozing with confidence and with a world class coach. The All Blacks played typical test match rugby, not flashy but enough to win. I agree with Manny, Richie showed his class amd worth as a team leader. He may not be in the best form as a fetcher but he still is the best flanker in the world.’
Having heaped all the praise on the AB’s I would have to say that they need to imrove by 15-20% if they are to beat the boks in Bloemfontein.
Maki says:
Jul 20, 2009
i cant understand why the wallabies keep referring to the statement “we are a young team and rebuilding” for their failure to close off games. We are going to be hearing the same exuse for years to come. All i can say is that your failure to beat an AB team low in confidence, has put the tri-nations on the platter for them, as i am sure that getting that first win even when they didnt play well can only spur them to play much better. Expect ABs to win 1 of the 2 games in SA chaps thanks to these hapless wallabies.
Manny says:
Jul 21, 2009
I don’t recall anyone on this site ever stating that the Wallabies is a ‘young team’ or using the re-building as an excuse for failing to win the game. You will have to show me those statements Maki because I cannot find them.
What is very clear though is that this Wallaby team is building up to the RWC; Deans’ appointment was just after the RWC’07 and was in the wake of the end of the era of players like Gregan and Larkham. His mandate was clear; rebuild the Wallabies team and take Australia to RWC’11. Players like Moore, Robinson, Horwill, Brown, Barnes to an extent, and O Connor are relatively new to the international rugby scene. In any case, as I stated before, this was not used as an excuse for the loss, if Maki reads my comment he will see that in my opinion, the mistakes made by the Wallabies cost them the game; not their age or the fact that they are re-building.
As for the tri-nations being handed on a platter to NZ because they won one game…..
NZ probably got the worst draw of all three teams, a tough opening game followed immediately by two games against a settled Bok side in South Africa. The Boks on the other hand probably got the most favourable draw; three home games to start the competition, two of which are against NZ, and one of the away games against Aus is in SA friendly Perth!
But it comes as no surprise that a Bok fan has already, several days before the game against NZ, started coming up with excuses for why the Boks will lose! If the Boks are such world beaters why would they fear facing a confident All Black team at home? Clearly from Maki’s statement the Wallabies had to soften up New Zealand, shatter their confidence, and then after the long trip across the Indian Ocean, only then would the so-called World Champions be confident of beating the Blacks and winning the tournament!
Maki says:
Jul 21, 2009
Manny relux! There is a difference about being overconfident and being realistic. I am realistic. The ABs, everyone knows on their day they can just turn it on and bring their A grade game and spring a surprise. The chances of that happening would have been minimal had the wallabies closed off that opening game, thats all i was saying. Even you know just how much confidence winning that 1st game brings, so suddenly what should have been a guaranteed 2 games at home for the boks could become a tricky 2 games. i am sure other boks will agree.
On the Aussie statement nowhere in my comments did i say that you made that statement. That excuse about youngsters etc came from your captain Sterling Mortlock.
Fraz says:
Jul 22, 2009
I don’t Believe these 2 home games for the boks are going to be tricky at all!!
I see the bok team as very settled with key players able to come off the bench. We have had the best possible preparation having played a lions team that in my opinion was a far more forbidable team than either the wallabies or AB showed in that opening game.
I foresee the boks leaving the homeland with 3 victories. Period.
Kambas says:
Jul 22, 2009
did anyone see the team sheet for the boks? what say you on fourie in place of jacobs. its a bit dicey if you ask me. i would have put de villiers at outside and wynand at inside.
Guru says:
Jul 23, 2009
Kambas, I am much more comfortable with Jacques Fourie starting than Wynand. Fourie is bigger, more physical and certainly more experienced. I would never move JEan from 12 because he has the best rugbyh brains, barring Fourie Du Preez, in the whole Bok squad. Jean can create and is more solid in defense. I am very happy with Jean at 12 and Jacques at 13. I do not think they will disappoint.